McKerrow v The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust (Race Discrimination : Prospective employees) [2011] UKEAT 0387_11_1711 (17 November 2011)
The appeal was allowed because there were material factual matters regarding the reason for withdrawal of the job offer that the Appellant should not be denied the opportunity to investigate, and it could not be said that the claim had no reasonable prospects of success.
- Citation
- [2011] UKEAT 0387_11_1711
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Strike Out of Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Strike Out Applications, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Strike Out of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in striking out the claim of race discrimination by way of victimisation on the basis that it had no reasonable prospects of success
- 2 Whether the Appellant should have been allowed to investigate the factual issue of why the job offer was withdrawn
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because there were material factual matters regarding the reason for withdrawal of the job offer that the Appellant should not be denied the opportunity to investigate, and it could not be said that the claim had no reasonable prospects of success.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of Employment Judge Pritchard set aside insofar as it relates to victimisation
- Case remitted to Employment Tribunal for determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment