Board v. Superdrug Stores Plc [2001] UKEAT 1230_00_2303 (23 March 2001)

There is an arguable point of law as to whether the appellant's letter constitutes a valid application for review under the Rules, warranting a full hearing on this procedural ground.

Citation: [2001] UKEAT 1230_00_2303
Parties: Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 23 March 2001
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome: Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing on procedural ground.
Legal Topics: Tribunal Procedure, Review Applications, Time Limits

Employment Law Procedural Law Tribunal Procedure Review Applications Time Limits

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Appellant

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

1 Whether a letter sent to the Tribunal within 14 days seeking a re-hearing constitutes a valid application for review under the Rules

Ratio Decidendi

There is an arguable point of law as to whether the appellant's letter constitutes a valid application for review under the Rules, warranting a full hearing on this procedural ground.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing on procedural ground.

Orders

Appellant to provide further written observations at least one week before the hearing.
Respondent to provide a skeleton argument and relevant authorities within the same time frame.