Paneri Ltd v. Charalambous [2000] EAT 474_99_0507 (5 July 2000)

Paneri Ltd v. Charalambous [2000] EAT 474_99_0507 (5 July 2000)

The Tribunal Chairman did not err in exercising discretion to refuse an adjournment as the Appellant had sufficient notice, failed to call available witnesses, and did not properly prepare documentation.

Citation
[2000] EAT 474_99_0507
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 July 2000
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Adjournment, Exercise of Discretion, Appeal Procedure
Civil Procedure Adjournment Exercise of Discretion Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Full Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal Chairman erred in refusing to consider an adjournment
  2. 2 Whether the Appellant was prejudiced by the refusal to adjourn

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal Chairman did not err in exercising discretion to refuse an adjournment as the Appellant had sufficient notice, failed to call available witnesses, and did not properly prepare documentation.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed