Cearns & Brown Ltd v. Richardson [2001] UKEAT 1109_00_2601 (26 January 2001)
The appeal is allowed to proceed on all grounds as there is an arguable case of legal error by the Tribunal in failing to consider specified factors.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1109_00_2601
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to proceed on all grounds; leave granted to add additional ground.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Grounds, Tribunal Error, Procedural Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by failing to consider specified factors under ground 1 of the Notice of Appeal
- 2 Whether additional grounds may be added to the appeal
- 3 Whether disputed points were raised at the original hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is allowed to proceed on all grounds as there is an arguable case of legal error by the Tribunal in failing to consider specified factors.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to proceed on all grounds; leave granted to add additional ground.
Orders
- Appellant to lodge amended grounds of appeal within 14 days incorporating sixth ground.
- Appellant to write to Respondent within 7 days regarding whether points were raised at original hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment