Doyle v North West London Hospitals NHS Trust (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2012] UKEAT 0271_11_0404 (04 April 2012)
The Tribunal erred in law by failing to raise and consider the Appellant's ability to pay before making a substantial costs order, despite the Appellant being legally represented, given the amount involved and circumstances.
- Citation
- [2012] UKEAT 0271_11_0404
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Ability to Pay, Misconceived Claims, Unreasonable Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by ordering the Appellant to pay the whole costs of proceedings based on conduct
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by failing to consider the Appellant's ability to pay before making a substantial costs order
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by failing to raise and consider the Appellant's ability to pay before making a substantial costs order, despite the Appellant being legally represented, given the amount involved and circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Tribunal's costs order set aside
- Matter remitted to same Tribunal to reconsider costs order after reasonable enquiries into Appellant's means
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment