Porter v. London Borough of Camden [2000] EAT 212_99_2206 (22 June 2000)

Porter v. London Borough of Camden [2000] EAT 212_99_2206 (22 June 2000)

The Tribunal correctly found that the employer responded appropriately and timely to the appellant's disability, made necessary adjustments, and did not treat her less favourably; no error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's decision.

Citation
[2000] EAT 212_99_2206
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments, Knowledge of Disability, Code of Practice
Employment Law Disability Discrimination Reasonable Adjustments Knowledge of Disability Code of Practice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the employer had actual or imputed knowledge of the appellant's disability
  2. 2 Whether the employer acted appropriately under the Disability Discrimination Act regarding workplace adjustments
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by not referring to the Code of Practice

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal correctly found that the employer responded appropriately and timely to the appellant's disability, made necessary adjustments, and did not treat her less favourably; no error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's decision.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed