Mills v. Hillingdon [2001] UKEAT 954_00_3001 (30 January 2001)

Mills v. Hillingdon [2001] UKEAT 954_00_3001 (30 January 2001)

Certain grounds of appeal are arguable, specifically regarding the continuity of disability, tribunal discretion on cross-examination, and interpretation of arrangements under section 6; leave is granted to argue these points.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 954_00_3001
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
30 January 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Leave granted to argue specified grounds; ground 6.5 withdrawn
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments, Tribunal Procedure
Employment Law Disability Discrimination Reasonable Adjustments Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tribunal erred in law regarding the continuity of the applicant's disability under section 1(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal wrongly exercised discretion in disallowing cross-examination regarding the applicant's depression
  3. 3 Whether a breakdown in arrangement constitutes 'arrangements' under section 6 of the Act

Ratio Decidendi

Certain grounds of appeal are arguable, specifically regarding the continuity of disability, tribunal discretion on cross-examination, and interpretation of arrangements under section 6; leave is granted to argue these points.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to argue specified grounds; ground 6.5 withdrawn

Orders

  • Half a day time estimate
  • Usual orders to skeleton arguments apply