Williams v Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council [1996] UKEAT 896_95_0202 (2 February 1996)

Williams v Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council [1996] UKEAT 896_95_0202 (2 February 1996)

The appellant demonstrated an arguable case sufficient to warrant a full hearing, justifying the grant of leave to proceed.

Citation
[1996] UKEAT 896_95_0202
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
02 February 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Leave granted for full hearing
Legal Topics
Disciplinary Procedure, Appeal Process, Industrial Tribunal
Employment Law Disciplinary Procedure Appeal Process Industrial Tribunal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant has an arguable case to proceed to full hearing
  2. 2 Whether Chairman's Notes should be obtained
  3. 3 Scope of evidence to be included in the Skeleton Argument

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant demonstrated an arguable case sufficient to warrant a full hearing, justifying the grant of leave to proceed.

Court Disposition

Leave granted for full hearing

Orders

  • Appellant to update Skeleton Argument to include new evidence and chronological list of employees and events
  • Chairman's Notes to be obtained, limited to treatment of other employees and Mr Fenning's warning