Waller v Bromsgrove District Council [2007] UKEAT 0019_07_2305 (23 May 2007)
The principles in Abdelghafar remain authoritative and are not modified by the introduction of rule 2A. The explanation for delay was not compelling, and none of the factors advanced by the appellant justify an extension of time. Procedural rules must be applied strictly to ensure fairness and justice.
- Citation
- [2007] UKEAT 0019_07_2305
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Registrar's Order / Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Time for Appealing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Unfair Dismissal, Whistleblower Protection, Overriding Objective, Procedural Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Registrar's Order / Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Time for Appealing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the time limit for appealing should be extended
- 2 Whether the introduction of rule 2A (overriding objective) modifies the Abdelghafar approach
- 3 Whether the amount at stake or prospects of success justify extension
Ratio Decidendi
The principles in Abdelghafar remain authoritative and are not modified by the introduction of rule 2A. The explanation for delay was not compelling, and none of the factors advanced by the appellant justify an extension of time. Procedural rules must be applied strictly to ensure fairness and justice.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No extension of time granted
- Appeal not allowed to proceed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment