Waller v Bromsgrove District Council [2007] UKEAT 0019_07_2305 (23 May 2007)

Waller v Bromsgrove District Council [2007] UKEAT 0019_07_2305 (23 May 2007)

The principles in Abdelghafar remain authoritative and are not modified by the introduction of rule 2A. The explanation for delay was not compelling, and none of the factors advanced by the appellant justify an extension of time. Procedural rules must be applied strictly to ensure fairness and justice.

Citation
[2007] UKEAT 0019_07_2305
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Registrar's Order / Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Time for Appealing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Unfair Dismissal, Whistleblower Protection, Overriding Objective, Procedural Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Registrar's Order / Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Time for Appealing

  1. 1 Whether the time limit for appealing should be extended
  2. 2 Whether the introduction of rule 2A (overriding objective) modifies the Abdelghafar approach
  3. 3 Whether the amount at stake or prospects of success justify extension

Ratio Decidendi

The principles in Abdelghafar remain authoritative and are not modified by the introduction of rule 2A. The explanation for delay was not compelling, and none of the factors advanced by the appellant justify an extension of time. Procedural rules must be applied strictly to ensure fairness and justice.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No extension of time granted
  • Appeal not allowed to proceed