Victor-Davis v. Hackney [2001] UKEAT 1269_01_2711 (27 November 2001)
The grounds of appeal relating to liability, victimisation, extension of time, and adequacy of handling of race discrimination complaints are arguable and should proceed to a full hearing.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1269_01_2711
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- grounds of appeal permitted to proceed to full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Victimisation, Extension of Time, Liability of Employer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 liability of respondents for actions of Mrs Ware
- 2 allegation of victimisation
- 3 extension of time for appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds of appeal relating to liability, victimisation, extension of time, and adequacy of handling of race discrimination complaints are arguable and should proceed to a full hearing.
Court Disposition
grounds of appeal permitted to proceed to full hearing
Orders
- Chairman to provide notes of Mrs Howard's evidence
- Skeleton arguments to be lodged and exchanged two months before hearing date
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment