Stack v Ajar -Tec Litd (Jurisdictional Points : Worker, employee or neither) [2011] UKEAT 0527_10_0807 (8 July 2011)
The Employment Judge misdirected himself in law by holding that absence of agreed remuneration necessarily negated the existence of a contract of service or for services. A contract may exist even if the amount of remuneration is not fixed, provided there is an intention to pay.
- Citation
- [2011] UKEAT 0527_10_0807
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Pre Hearing Review Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Worker Status, Employee Status, Constructive Dismissal, Contract Formation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Pre Hearing Review Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was an employee or worker under the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether absence of agreed remuneration negates existence of a contract of service or for services
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Judge misdirected himself in law by holding that absence of agreed remuneration necessarily negated the existence of a contract of service or for services. A contract may exist even if the amount of remuneration is not fixed, provided there is an intention to pay.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Issue remitted to a different Employment Judge to determine whether a contract of service or for services existed entitling the appellant to remuneration, albeit not fixed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment