Chakraborty v Islington London Borough Council [1995] UKEAT 549_95_2007 (20 July 1995)

Chakraborty v Islington London Borough Council [1995] UKEAT 549_95_2007 (20 July 1995)

The tribunal found no evidence or inference that the appellant was denied upgrading due to his Indian ethnic origin, and the respondents followed proper procedures for regrading.

Citation
[1995] UKEAT 549_95_2007
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondents
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
20 July 1995
Procedural Posture
Employment Discrimination Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Racial Discrimination, Equal Opportunities, Employment Grading, Tribunal Procedure
Employment Law Discrimination Law Racial Discrimination Equal Opportunities Employment Grading Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Respondents

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Discrimination Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was racially discriminated against in not being upgraded to PO3 grade
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal failed to consider the Equal Opportunities Employment Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found no evidence or inference that the appellant was denied upgrading due to his Indian ethnic origin, and the respondents followed proper procedures for regrading.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.