Melrose v Reigate Housing Society For The Elderly [1996] UKEAT 181_96_2810 (28 October 1996)
The Tribunal's findings on non-discrimination and retirement age were challenged due to evidence suggesting a gender-based difference in retirement policy; the Appeal Tribunal determined this evidence should be reviewed at a full hearing.
- Citation
- [1996] UKEAT 181_96_2810
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- Leave granted for full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Retirement Age, Sex Discrimination, Employment Contract Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondents
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was disqualified from claiming due to reaching normal retirement age under Section 64(1)(b) of the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act
- 2 Whether there was sex discrimination in retirement age contrary to Section 6(2)(b) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's findings on non-discrimination and retirement age were challenged due to evidence suggesting a gender-based difference in retirement policy; the Appeal Tribunal determined this evidence should be reviewed at a full hearing.
Court Disposition
Leave granted for full hearing
Orders
- Matter to proceed to full hearing
- Relevant parts of Chairman's notes to be abstracted for review
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment