Galiara v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Penalty) [2018] UKFTT 190 (TC) (03 April 2018)
The respondents failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that notices to file were served on the appellant for the relevant tax years as required by section 8 of the Taxes Management Act 1970. The evidence provided, namely the 'Return Summary' sheet, was insufficient to establish service. Therefore, the penalties imposed could not stand.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 190 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Penalty Appeal / Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Drawing Inferences, Service of Notice, Self Assessment Tax Returns, Admissibility of Business Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondents
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Penalty Appeal / Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents proved service of notice to file under section 8 Taxes Management Act 1970
- 2 Whether the imposition of self-assessment and penalties was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that notices to file were served on the appellant for the relevant tax years as required by section 8 of the Taxes Management Act 1970. The evidence provided, namely the 'Return Summary' sheet, was insufficient to establish service. Therefore, the penalties imposed could not stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Penalties for both relevant tax years quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment