Gayle v. Post Office & Ors [2000] UKEAT 786_00_1812 (18 December 2000)
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find, on the evidence, that there was no continuing act of discrimination and that the grievance was resolved to the Appellant's satisfaction. There was no error of law or perversity in their findings, and the complaints were out of time.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 786_00_1812
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Limitation Period, Continuing Act, Just and Equitable Extension
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondents
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in failing to identify a continuous course of conduct to bring complaints within time
- 2 Whether there was a continuing act of discrimination
- 3 Whether it was just and equitable to allow complaints out of time
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find, on the evidence, that there was no continuing act of discrimination and that the grievance was resolved to the Appellant's satisfaction. There was no error of law or perversity in their findings, and the complaints were out of time.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed at preliminary hearing stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment