Davis & Ors v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Anti-avoidance) [2018] UKFTT 559 (TC) (26 September 2018)
The arrangements were designed, at least in part, to avoid UK tax by using a Mauritian company to benefit from the UK-Mauritius Double Taxation Treaty. The transfer of assets legislation applies, and the income of the Mauritian company is deemed to be that of the Appellants and taxable in the UK. The Treaty does not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 559 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellants; Respondent: HMRC
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Assets, Double Taxation Agreements, Tax Avoidance, Attribution of Income, Treaty Relief
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellants
Appellant
HMRC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the income of a Mauritian company (ABP) can be attributed to UK-resident individuals under UK transfer of assets legislation
- 2 Whether the UK-Mauritius Double Taxation Treaty prevents such attribution and UK taxation
- 3 Whether the arrangements constituted tax avoidance or bona fide commercial transactions
Ratio Decidendi
The arrangements were designed, at least in part, to avoid UK tax by using a Mauritian company to benefit from the UK-Mauritius Double Taxation Treaty. The transfer of assets legislation applies, and the income of the Mauritian company is deemed to be that of the Appellants and taxable in the UK. The Treaty does not protect the Appellants from UK tax on this deemed income, as they are not resident in Mauritius and the Treaty relief does not apply to them.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment