Lowery & Anor v. Ali [2000] EAT 1152_99_2501 (25 January 2000)
There are arguable errors of law in the Tribunal's approach to drawing inferences of racial discrimination and in its reasoning for compensation awards, justifying a full appeal hearing.
- Citation
- [2000] EAT 1152_99_2501
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellants; Appellant's Solicitor: Mark Taylor & Co.; Respondent: Mr Lowery
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted; Proceeding to Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted; matter proceeds to full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Inference Drawing by Tribunal, Compensation Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellants
Appellant
Mark Taylor & Co.
Appellant's Solicitor
Mr Lowery
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted; Proceeding to Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in drawing inferences of racial discrimination
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's findings regarding stereotypical assumptions were erroneous
- 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in its reasoning for awards for injury to feelings and loss of salary
Ratio Decidendi
There are arguable errors of law in the Tribunal's approach to drawing inferences of racial discrimination and in its reasoning for compensation awards, justifying a full appeal hearing.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted; matter proceeds to full hearing
Orders
- Matter to proceed to full hearing on grounds set out in Notice of Appeal
- Skeleton arguments to be exchanged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment