Knight Berkeley Ltd v Spark [1996] UKEAT 807_95_1705 (17 May 1996)
The appeal was withdrawn and pursuing it was unreasonable; therefore, it is proper to order the appellants to pay the respondent's costs.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1996] UKEAT 807_95_1705
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellants; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Withdrawal, Costs Order
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal Withdrawal
Civil Procedure Costs Appeal Withdrawal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Appellants
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Withdrawal, Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded against appellants after withdrawal of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was withdrawn and pursuing it was unreasonable; therefore, it is proper to order the appellants to pay the respondent's costs.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellants to pay Respondent's costs
- Order not to be enforced without leave of Tribunal or agreement between parties
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment