Gambau v. Mark Catering Ltd [2000] UKEAT 286_00_2306 (23 June 2000)
The points raised by the appellants, particularly those in paragraphs 3(1) and 8 of the skeleton argument, are arguable and justify a full hearing to determine the correct construction of the Regulations as applied to casual night work.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 286_00_2306
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellants; Respondent: Respondent Employer
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Permission granted for full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Working Time Regulations, Employee Entitlements, Casual Employment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellants
Appellant
Respondent Employer
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Working Time Regulations apply to employees' casual night work in addition to their day work for the same employer
Ratio Decidendi
The points raised by the appellants, particularly those in paragraphs 3(1) and 8 of the skeleton argument, are arguable and justify a full hearing to determine the correct construction of the Regulations as applied to casual night work.
Court Disposition
Permission granted for full hearing
Orders
- Appellants to draft amended grounds of appeal embracing paragraphs 3(1) and 8 of the skeleton argument.
- Matter to proceed in listing Category B with usual direction for skeleton arguments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment