Gestetner Manufacturing Ltd v Braithwaite [1996] UKEAT 701_95_0805 (8 May 1996)
The tribunal erred by substituting its own view for that of the employer regarding the details of the selection criteria and by engaging in an over-minute investigation of the process, rather than assessing whether the employer's actions fell within the range of reasonable responses. Consideration of previous...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1996] UKEAT 701_95_0805
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellants; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Selection Criteria, Industrial Tribunal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellants
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the industrial tribunal erred in finding the respondent was unfairly dismissed due to the application of selection criteria for redundancy
- 2 Whether the tribunal substituted its own view for that of the employer regarding selection criteria
- 3 Whether consideration of previous redundancy scoring methods was relevant
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal erred by substituting its own view for that of the employer regarding the details of the selection criteria and by engaging in an over-minute investigation of the process, rather than assessing whether the employer's actions fell within the range of reasonable responses. Consideration of previous redundancy procedures was not relevant to the fairness of the current dismissal.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- case remitted to a new tribunal for rehearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment