Apex Logistics Ltd v. Conheeney [2000] UKEAT 6_2000_2903 (29 March 2000)

Apex Logistics Ltd v. Conheeney [2000] UKEAT 6_2000_2903 (29 March 2000)

The Chairman's decision was based on findings of fact, preferring the respondent's evidence, and holding that the respondent was a worker entitled to remuneration and that deductions were wrongful and unagreed.

Citation
[2000] UKEAT 6_2000_2903
Parties
Appellant: Appellants; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 March 2000
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Worker Status, Remuneration Deductions, Self Employment Vs Employment
Employment Law Worker Status Remuneration Deductions Self Employment Vs Employment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellants

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was a worker under section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
  2. 2 Whether deductions from remuneration were lawful

Ratio Decidendi

The Chairman's decision was based on findings of fact, preferring the respondent's evidence, and holding that the respondent was a worker entitled to remuneration and that deductions were wrongful and unagreed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed as unappealable; Chairman's decision stands.