Kemmeni v The Morse Group Ltd & Ors [2003] UKEAT 0520_02_2802 (28 February 2003)
The Tribunal's findings on commission and discrimination were supported by sufficient evidence and reasoning, but the Applicant was denied procedural fairness regarding costs submissions, requiring the matter to be remitted for proper consideration.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0520_02_2802
- Parties
- Appellant: Applicant; Respondents: Morse Computers, Mr Lewis, Mr Carroll
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; remitted to Employment Tribunal for reconsideration of costs against First Respondent; individual Respondents dismissed from proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Grievance Procedure, Commission Entitlement, Race Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant
Appellant
Morse Computers, Mr Lewis, Mr Carroll
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal made sufficient findings of fact to justify its decision
- 2 Whether the Applicant was entitled to commission on the Boo.com contract
- 3 Whether the Applicant was unfairly dismissed or discriminated against
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's findings on commission and discrimination were supported by sufficient evidence and reasoning, but the Applicant was denied procedural fairness regarding costs submissions, requiring the matter to be remitted for proper consideration.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; remitted to Employment Tribunal for reconsideration of costs against First Respondent; individual Respondents dismissed from proceedings.
Orders
- Matter remitted to Employment Tribunal for Applicant to comment on costs award.
- Individual Respondents dismissed from proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment