Okunowo v Bury Women's Aid [1995] UKEAT 1037_94_1603 (16 March 1995)
No point of law was identified; prior disclosure and election to proceed bars subsequent challenge for bias; evidentiary matters are for the Tribunal, not the appellate body.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 1037_94_1603
- Parties
- Respondent: Bury Women's Aid; Appellant: Applicant (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Industrial Tribunal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Bias in Tribunal Proceedings, Appeal on Point of Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Bury Women's Aid
Respondent
Applicant (unnamed)
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Industrial Tribunal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was bias or apparent bias in the Tribunal proceedings
- 2 Whether evidence was wrongly admitted or excluded
- 3 Whether there is a point of law for appeal
Ratio Decidendi
No point of law was identified; prior disclosure and election to proceed bars subsequent challenge for bias; evidentiary matters are for the Tribunal, not the appellate body.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no further orders
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment