Dickenson v. Security of State for Trade & Industry [2000] UKEAT 229_00_1406 (14 June 2000)

The Tribunal properly directed itself in law, considered all relevant facts, and its decision was not perverse; therefore, the Applicant was not found to be an employee under section 230 of the Act.

Citation: [2000] UKEAT 229_00_1406
Parties: Appellant: Applicant; Respondent: Marini Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 14 June 2000
Procedural Posture: Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Employee Status, Contract of Employment, Director as Employee

Employment Law Company Law Employee Status Contract of Employment Director as Employee

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

Applicant

Appellant

Marini Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Applicant was an employee under section 230 of the Employment Rights Act
2 Whether the Tribunal properly directed itself in law
3 Whether the Tribunal's findings were perverse

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal properly directed itself in law, considered all relevant facts, and its decision was not perverse; therefore, the Applicant was not found to be an employee under section 230 of the Act.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

Appeal is dismissed.