Readhead v Hanover Housing Association [2003] UKEAT 0487_02_1601 (16 January 2003)
The Employment Tribunal properly exercised its discretion under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, considering relevant factors including the statutory limitation period, prejudice to the Respondent, and the possibility of a remedy against Solicitors. No error of law or perversity was demonstrated.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0487_02_1601
- Parties
- Appellant: Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Limitation Periods, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in refusing to extend time for presenting a disability discrimination claim
- 2 Whether the Tribunal considered relevant factors in exercising its discretion under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal properly exercised its discretion under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, considering relevant factors including the statutory limitation period, prejudice to the Respondent, and the possibility of a remedy against Solicitors. No error of law or perversity was demonstrated.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment