Eyitene v. Post Office [2001] UKEAT 0859_01_1911 (19 November 2001)

Eyitene v. Post Office [2001] UKEAT 0859_01_1911 (19 November 2001)

There are arguable errors of law as to whether Regulation 12(7) applies to a withdrawal and whether the Tribunal sufficiently particularised the basis for a costs order under Regulation 12(1).

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 0859_01_1911
Parties
Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
19 November 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Permission to proceed to full Tribunal granted
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Costs Orders, Withdrawal of Application
Employment Law Race Discrimination Costs Orders Withdrawal of Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant

Applicant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Regulation 12(7) of the Employment Tribunal Constitution Regulations applies to a withdrawal of an application
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in making a costs order without particularising unreasonable conduct under Regulation 12(1)

Ratio Decidendi

There are arguable errors of law as to whether Regulation 12(7) applies to a withdrawal and whether the Tribunal sufficiently particularised the basis for a costs order under Regulation 12(1).

Court Disposition

Permission to proceed to full Tribunal granted

Orders

  • Appellant has 21 days to amend grounds of appeal
  • Usual order as to skeleton arguments