Tuckett v. Ovum Ltd [2003] UKEAT 0311_03_1908 (19 August 2003)

Tuckett v. Ovum Ltd [2003] UKEAT 0311_03_1908 (19 August 2003)

Applicant's grounds do not meet the threshold for review under EAT Rule 33; allegations of bias and criticism of judge's conduct are unfounded; the report of Dr Morgan was previously considered and does not constitute new grounds.

Citation
[2003] UKEAT 0311_03_1908
Parties
Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
19 August 2003
Procedural Posture
Rule 3(10) Application for Review / Post Judgment Review
Outcome
Application for review refused
Legal Topics
Review of Tribunal Judgment, Bias Allegations, Disability Discrimination
Employment Law Review of Tribunal Judgment Bias Allegations Disability Discrimination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant

Applicant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Rule 3(10) Application for Review / Post Judgment Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether grounds exist for review under EAT Rule 33
  2. 2 Whether allegations of bias warrant setting aside the judgment
  3. 3 Whether criticism of judge's conduct affects the outcome

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant's grounds do not meet the threshold for review under EAT Rule 33; allegations of bias and criticism of judge's conduct are unfounded; the report of Dr Morgan was previously considered and does not constitute new grounds.

Court Disposition

Application for review refused

Orders

  • No grounds for review; application dismissed