Khan v. The Post Office [2000] UKEAT 1238_99_0905 (9 May 2000)

Khan v. The Post Office [2000] UKEAT 1238_99_0905 (9 May 2000)

The Tribunal did not err in law in its approach to the evidence, the assessment of conspiracy and continuing acts, or in its findings regarding promotion and disclosure. The Tribunal considered the case as a whole and made findings within its jurisdiction. No error of law or fact was established.

Citation
[2000] UKEAT 1238_99_0905
Parties
Appellant: Applicant; Respondent: Respondents
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 May 2000
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Burden of Proof, Continuing Acts, Disclosure of Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant

Appellant

Respondents

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in its approach to allegations of conspiracy and continuing acts of discrimination
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself by adopting a fragmented approach rather than considering the cumulative effect of facts
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal's findings regarding promotion and application for a job were perverse or unsupported by evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not err in law in its approach to the evidence, the assessment of conspiracy and continuing acts, or in its findings regarding promotion and disclosure. The Tribunal considered the case as a whole and made findings within its jurisdiction. No error of law or fact was established.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal refused