Oritsejaro v. Royal Mail Group Plc [2003] UKEAT 0572_03_1709 (17 September 2003)
Applicant failed to provide a sufficient explanation for lodging the appeal out of time; statutory time limits must be observed and no exceptional circumstances were established.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0572_03_1709
- Parties
- Appellant: Applicant; Respondent: Royal Mail Group Plc
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Registrar’s Order / Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Time Limits for Appeals, Costs in Employment Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Applicant
Appellant
Royal Mail Group Plc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Registrar’s Order / Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was lodged in time
- 2 Whether there was a proper explanation for the delay
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the Applicant
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to provide a sufficient explanation for lodging the appeal out of time; statutory time limits must be observed and no exceptional circumstances were established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Applicant to pay Respondent £50 in costs under Rule 34
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment