Sealskinz Limited v Aqua Sealz Ltd (Full Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17159 (08 June 2016)

Sealskinz Limited v Aqua Sealz Ltd (Full Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17159 (08 June 2016)

The panel found that the Respondent's registration did not meet the threshold for abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17159
Parties
Complainant: Sealskinz Limited; Respondent: Aqua Sealz Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
08 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sealskinz Limited

Complainant

Aqua Sealz Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the Respondent is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the Respondent's registration did not meet the threshold for abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name