Miss K Allinson v Aramark Defence Services Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2023] UKET 6000319/2023 (23 May 2023)
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that age was the reason for the treatment complained of.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] UKET 6000319/2023
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss K Allinson; Respondent: Aramark Defence Services Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination
Employment Law Discrimination Law Age Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Miss K Allinson
Claimant
Aramark Defence Services Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of age
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that age was the reason for the treatment complained of.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment