Mr R Padun v Arcstream Ltd and N Dickinson (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2023] UKET 2301632/2022 (8 February 2023)
The tribunal found that the respondents breached the claimant's employment contract and the claimant was entitled to damages.
- Citation
- [2023] UKET 2301632/2022
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr R Padun; Respondent: Arcstream Ltd; Respondent: N Dickinson
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Breach of Contract / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Employment Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr R Padun
Claimant
Arcstream Ltd
Respondent
N Dickinson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Breach of Contract / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents breached the claimant's employment contract
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondents breached the claimant's employment contract and the claimant was entitled to damages.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld in part
Orders
- Respondents to pay damages to the claimant for breach of contract
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment