Miss M Matthews v Arysta LifeScience GB Ltd (England and Wales : Equal Pay Act) [2020] UKET 1306311/2019 (26 May 2020)

The tribunal found that the claimant was not paid equally for equal work and that the respondent failed to provide a material factor defence unrelated to gender.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2020] UKET 1306311/2019
Parties: Claimant: Miss M Matthews; Respondent: Arysta LifeScience GB Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 26 May 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Equal Pay, Discrimination

Employment Law Equal Pay Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss M Matthews

Claimant

Arysta LifeScience GB Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant received equal pay for equal work under the Equal Pay Act

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was not paid equally for equal work and that the respondent failed to provide a material factor defence unrelated to gender.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay the claimant arrears of pay to remedy the breach of the Equal Pay Act

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.