Miss M Matthews v Arysta LifeScience GB Ltd (England and Wales : Equal Pay Act) [2020] UKET 1306311/2019 (26 May 2020)
The tribunal found that the claimant was not paid equally for equal work and that the respondent failed to provide a material factor defence unrelated to gender.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] UKET 1306311/2019
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss M Matthews; Respondent: Arysta LifeScience GB Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay, Discrimination
Employment Law Equal Pay Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Miss M Matthews
Claimant
Arysta LifeScience GB Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant received equal pay for equal work under the Equal Pay Act
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was not paid equally for equal work and that the respondent failed to provide a material factor defence unrelated to gender.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay the claimant arrears of pay to remedy the breach of the Equal Pay Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment