AB Electrolux v As-nu (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17276 (24 May 2016)

AB Electrolux v As-nu (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17276 (24 May 2016)

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy, including rights in the mark, lack of respondent's legitimate interest, and bad faith registration/use.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17276
Parties
Complainant: AB Electrolux; Respondent: As-nu
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
24 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AB Electrolux

Complainant

As-nu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy, including rights in the mark, lack of respondent's legitimate interest, and bad faith registration/use.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant