Keolis Amey Docklands Limited v Ash Bansal (Full Decision _No Action) [2014] DRS 14568 (15 September 2014)

Keolis Amey Docklands Limited v Ash Bansal (Full Decision _No Action) [2014] DRS 14568 (15 September 2014)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the respondent registered or used the domain name in bad faith; therefore, the complaint was denied.

Citation
[2014] DRS 14568
Parties
Complainant: Keolis Amey Docklands Limited; Respondent: Ash Bansal
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
15 September 2014
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Marks, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Marks Passing Off

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Keolis Amey Docklands Limited

Complainant

Ash Bansal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the respondent registered or used the domain name in bad faith; therefore, the complaint was denied.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied