Asiana Ltd v Revenue & Customs (EXCISE DUTY APPEALS : Jurisdiction) [2018] UKFTT 350 (TC) (26 June 2018)
Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of the Community Customs Code do not apply to excise duty, and the First-tier Tribunal does not have jurisdiction under section 16(5) of the Finance Act 1994 to consider matters of legitimate expectation in appeals against excise duty assessments.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 350
- Parties
- Appellant: Asiana Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Excise Duty Appeal (jurisdiction) / Preliminary Issue on Tribunal Jurisdiction and Legitimate Expectation
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue determined against the appellant; FTT lacks jurisdiction to consider legitimate expectation in excise duty appeals.
- Legal Topics
- Excise Duty, Customs Duty, Jurisdiction of First Tier Tribunal, Legitimate Expectation, Community Customs Code, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Asiana Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Excise Duty Appeal (jurisdiction) / Preliminary Issue on Tribunal Jurisdiction and Legitimate Expectation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of the Community Customs Code apply to excise duty as they do to customs duty
- 2 Whether the First-tier Tribunal has jurisdiction under section 16(5) of the Finance Act 1994 to consider matters of legitimate expectation in excise duty appeals
Ratio Decidendi
Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of the Community Customs Code do not apply to excise duty, and the First-tier Tribunal does not have jurisdiction under section 16(5) of the Finance Act 1994 to consider matters of legitimate expectation in appeals against excise duty assessments.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue determined against the appellant; FTT lacks jurisdiction to consider legitimate expectation in excise duty appeals.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment