Rahman v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX - penalties for late payment) [2020] UKFTT 393 (TC) (07 October 2020)
The appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for late payment of tax, as inability to pay was not due to events outside his control and his circumstances did not amount to special circumstances. HMRC's refusal to reduce penalties was not flawed. Permission to appeal out of time was refused due to significant unexplained delay.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT 393
- Parties
- Appellant: Ata Ur Rahman; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Permission to appeal out of time refused.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Penalties for Late Payment, Reasonable Excuse, Special Circumstances, Appeal Out of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ata Ur Rahman
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late payment of income tax under Schedule 56 Finance Act 2009
- 2 Whether HMRC's refusal to reduce penalties for special circumstances was flawed
- 3 Whether permission to appeal out of time should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for late payment of tax, as inability to pay was not due to events outside his control and his circumstances did not amount to special circumstances. HMRC's refusal to reduce penalties was not flawed. Permission to appeal out of time was refused due to significant unexplained delay.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Permission to appeal out of time refused.
Orders
- Fixed penalties for tax years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment