Studio A LLC D/b/a Blackpool Records v Augustus Squillace (Summary Decision _No Action) [2020] DRS 22357 (22 April 2020)

Studio A LLC D/b/a Blackpool Records v Augustus Squillace (Summary Decision _No Action) [2020] DRS 22357 (22 April 2020)

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy; therefore, no action was taken.

Citation
[2020] DRS 22357
Parties
Complainant: Studio A LLC D/b/a Blackpool Records; Respondent: Augustus Squillace
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Rights
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Studio A LLC D/b/a Blackpool Records

Complainant

Augustus Squillace

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the disputed domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy; therefore, no action was taken.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name