Mrs J Heasman v Autoprotect (MBI) Ltd (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2019] UKET 3200504/2019 (24 July 2019)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed as the respondent failed to follow a fair procedure.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2019] UKET 3200504/2019
Parties: Claimant: Mrs J Heasman; Respondent: Autoprotect (MBI) Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 24 July 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Unfair Dismissal

Employment Law Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mrs J Heasman

Claimant

Autoprotect (MBI) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed as the respondent failed to follow a fair procedure.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.