P Bird and Others v Axis Productions Ltd (In Administration) (Scotland : Protective Award) [2025] UKET 4107359/2024 (9 May 2025)

The Tribunal found that Axis Productions Ltd failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult, and therefore a protective award was appropriate.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 4107359/2024
Parties: Claimant: P Bird and Others; Respondent: Axis Productions Ltd (In Administration)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 09 May 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
Outcome: Protective award granted in favour of the claimants
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Consultation Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

P Bird and Others

Claimant

Axis Productions Ltd (In Administration)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to consult with employees as required under collective redundancy provisions
2 Whether a protective award should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Axis Productions Ltd failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult, and therefore a protective award was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of the claimants

Orders

Respondent to pay a protective award to the claimants for the relevant period

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.