Mr S McEvoy v Azzurri Restaurants Ltd (In Administration) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2021] UKET 2409268/2020 (2 August 2021)

The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult with employee representatives prior to redundancy dismissals, justifying the making of a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2021] UKET 2409268/2020
Parties: Claimant: Mr S McEvoy; Respondent: Azzurri Restaurants Ltd (In Administration)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 02 August 2021
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
Outcome: Protective award granted in favour of the claimant.
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Consultation Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr S McEvoy

Claimant

Azzurri Restaurants Ltd (In Administration)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to consult with employee representatives as required under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult with employee representatives prior to redundancy dismissals, justifying the making of a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of the claimant.

Orders

Respondent to pay a protective award to the claimant for the relevant period.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.