A v B (Disability Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2013] UKEAT 0383_11_2301 (23 January 2013)

A v B (Disability Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2013] UKEAT 0383_11_2301 (23 January 2013)

The Employment Tribunal's findings that the Claimant's dismissal was fair, not wrongful, and not discriminatory were upheld. There was no failure to make reasonable adjustments, as there was no credible evidence that the Claimant's depression caused his failure to register or placed him at a substantial disadvantage. The Respondent's actions fell within the range of reasonable responses for an employer of its size, and the Claimant was not treated less favourably than a non-disabled comparator.

Citation
[2013] UKEAT 0383_11_2301
Parties
Claimant: A; Respondent: B
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; Employment Tribunal decision upheld
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Wrongful Dismissal, Reasonable Adjustments, Gross Misconduct
Employment Law Discrimination Law Disability Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Wrongful Dismissal Reasonable Adjustments Gross Misconduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A

Claimant

B

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the dismissal of the Claimant was unfair, wrongful, or discriminatory under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments for the Claimant's disability
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent's investigation and disciplinary process were adequate and within the range of reasonable responses

Ratio Decidendi

The Employment Tribunal's findings that the Claimant's dismissal was fair, not wrongful, and not discriminatory were upheld. There was no failure to make reasonable adjustments, as there was no credible evidence that the Claimant's depression caused his failure to register or placed him at a substantial disadvantage. The Respondent's actions fell within the range of reasonable responses for an employer of its size, and the Claimant was not treated less favourably than a non-disabled comparator.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; Employment Tribunal decision upheld

Orders

  • All claims of the Claimant are dismissed
  • No unfair, wrongful, or discriminatory dismissal found