Halina Dorola Krupa v B & M Retail Ltd and others (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure : Race Discrimination) [2017] UKET 2400660/2016 (28 March 2017)

Halina Dorola Krupa v B & M Retail Ltd and others (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure : Race Discrimination) [2017] UKET 2400660/2016 (28 March 2017)

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had made protected disclosures and suffered detriment or dismissal as a result, and whether there was evidence of race discrimination.

Citation
[2017] UKET 2400660/2016
Parties
Claimant: Halina Dorola Krupa; Respondent: B & M Retail Ltd; Respondent: others
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
28 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in the provided text
Legal Topics
Public Interest Disclosure, Race Discrimination
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Race Discrimination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Halina Dorola Krupa

Claimant

B & M Retail Ltd

Respondent

others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment or dismissal for making a protected disclosure
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was discriminated against on the grounds of race

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had made protected disclosures and suffered detriment or dismissal as a result, and whether there was evidence of race discrimination.

Court Disposition

Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in the provided text