L Grigor v Bathing Mobility Advisory Service Ltd (Scotland : Public Interest Disclosure) [2025] UKET 8000675/2024 (10 March 2025)

The tribunal found that the claimant made a protected disclosure and suffered detriment as a result, entitling the claimant to remedies under the relevant legislation.

Citation: [2025] UKET 8000675/2024
Parties: Claimant: L Grigor; Respondent: Bathing Mobility Advisory Service Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 10 March 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

L Grigor

Claimant

Bathing Mobility Advisory Service Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant made a protected disclosure and suffered detriment as a result, entitling the claimant to remedies under the relevant legislation.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation to the claimant
Respondent to take steps to prevent further detriment to the claimant