Ahmed v Bedford Borough Council (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out/dismissal) [2013] UKEAT 0064_13_1705 (17 May 2013)
The Employment Judge erred by failing to address whether a fair trial was possible and by not considering lesser sanctions before striking out the claims. The appeal is allowed and the strike-out application is remitted for reconsideration before a different Employment Judge.
- Citation
- [2013] UKEAT 0064_13_1705
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Ahmed; Respondent: Bedford Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Strike Out of Claims
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination, Strike Out Procedure, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Ahmed
Claimant
Bedford Borough Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Strike Out of Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Judge erred in striking out the claims without considering if a fair trial was possible or if a lesser sanction was appropriate
- 2 Whether the claimant's conduct justified strike-out under ET rule 18(7)(c)
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Judge erred by failing to address whether a fair trial was possible and by not considering lesser sanctions before striking out the claims. The appeal is allowed and the strike-out application is remitted for reconsideration before a different Employment Judge.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Strike-out application remitted to a different Employment Judge for reconsideration
- Further pre-hearing review and case management discussion to be held if necessary
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment