Mrs C Woolford v Beefjack Promote Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Time Off) [2017] UKET 3300386/2017 (2 June 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the employment contract by not providing the required time off.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 3300386/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mrs C Woolford; Respondent: Beefjack Promote Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 02 June 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Time Off

Employment Law Breach of Contract Time Off

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mrs C Woolford

Claimant

Beefjack Promote Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent breached the employment contract by failing to provide time off as required

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the employment contract by not providing the required time off.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation to the claimant for breach of contract

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.