Miller v Bellway Homes Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0309_09_2601 (26 January 2010)
The Respondent's requirement for full-time work was not objectively justified, resulting in indirect sex discrimination and unfair dismissal. The Tribunal failed to consider a material factor regarding the cut-off date for lost earnings, requiring remission for further consideration.
- Citation
- [2010] UKEAT 0309_09_2601
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss Jayne Miller; Respondent: Bellway Homes Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Respondent's appeal dismissed; Claimant's remedy appeal allowed on causation point; cross-appeal not considered.
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Remedy, Perversity, Injury to Feelings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Jayne Miller
Claimant
Bellway Homes Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent's requirement for full-time work was objectively justified
- 2 Whether the dismissal was unfair
- 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in determining the cut-off date for lost earnings
Ratio Decidendi
The Respondent's requirement for full-time work was not objectively justified, resulting in indirect sex discrimination and unfair dismissal. The Tribunal failed to consider a material factor regarding the cut-off date for lost earnings, requiring remission for further consideration.
Court Disposition
Respondent's appeal dismissed; Claimant's remedy appeal allowed on causation point; cross-appeal not considered.
Orders
- Remit causation question regarding cut-off date for lost earnings to same Employment Tribunal for further consideration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment