Mr James Stuart Bilsbrough v Berry Marketing Services Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal) [2019] UKET 1401692/2018 (5 July 2019)
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed because he made a protected disclosure, and this was the principal reason for his dismissal, rendering the dismissal automatically unfair.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] UKET 1401692/2018
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr James Stuart Bilsbrough; Respondent: Berry Marketing Services Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Unfair Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr James Stuart Bilsbrough
Claimant
Berry Marketing Services Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed because he made a protected disclosure, and this was the principal reason for his dismissal, rendering the dismissal automatically unfair.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment