M'Culloch's Trustees v. Macculloch [1903] UKHL 88 (24 November 1903)
The appellant is not entitled to immediate payment or conveyance of any part of the residue because the testator intended the estate to remain unsevered until the death of the last surviving child, and section 17 of the Entail Amendment (Scotland) Act 1868 does not apply to a fiar.
- Citation
- [1903] UKHL 88
- Parties
- Respondent: M'Culloch's Trustees; Appellant: Bertram Douglas Macculloch
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment by House of Lords
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Trust Disposition and Settlement, Payment of Vested Share, Entail Amendment (scotland) Act 1868 Section 17, Liferent and Fee, Period of Distribution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M'Culloch's Trustees
Respondent
Bertram Douglas Macculloch
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment by House of Lords
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to immediate payment of a vested share of residue under the terms of the will and section 17 of the Entail Amendment (Scotland) Act 1868
- 2 Whether the testator's intention postpones payment until the death of all his children
- 3 Whether section 17 applies to a fiar rather than a liferenter
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant is not entitled to immediate payment or conveyance of any part of the residue because the testator intended the estate to remain unsevered until the death of the last surviving child, and section 17 of the Entail Amendment (Scotland) Act 1868 does not apply to a fiar.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- judgment of Second Division affirmed
- appellant found liable for expenses of appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment